
By: The Scribe
During the course of our previous interview with one of the NUESA Presidential Candidate, Emmanuel Olamide Samuel, ‘Mazi’, some expressions were made against the former Nuesa-UI Speaker, Rt. Hon. Usman Bolarinwa (USB) which spurred his reactions.
In an interview with USB, he responded to all allegations placed against him by the former sports director as it concerns a petition publicly signed and orchestrated by the former Nuesa FLC Speaker.
Scribe: Good Afternoon. Kindly introduce yourself.
USB: Afternoon sir. My name is BOLARINWA USMAN (Rt. hon), former speaker NUESA FLC 11th assembly.
Scribe: Can you help add your department and level, Sir?
USB: I’m a 400l student of the department of Adult Education.
Scribe: Alright. Let’s walk this way. Before you submitted that petition against the former Sport Director, who is also an aspirant for the position of Nuesa President, were there any heated differences between you and him, directly or indirectly?
USB: Yes we had heated differences as a result of the NUESA cup. If there is no competition, I don’t think there will be a problem. I only care about all NUESA events be it socially, sporty or politically and I will never allow anybody to dent our name within or outside the faculty.
Scribe: Likewise, objectively, not minding that petition, do you find him capable as a Sports Director.
USB: Capable? I believe if the word capable is used in the right context, he will never have had the opportunity to purchase a form but this is a free world and I believe if he had an opponent then, he can never win.
Scribe: Alright. Let’s clear some lines. For members of the public, most especially Educators, who were not aware of the petition’s content, can you briefly run us through the major details?
USB: Okay. Like I wrote in my letter to the FLC, CEC and ESEC and I quote;
“The Sports Director’s failure to uphold his duties and responsibilities has had a detrimental impact on the smooth running of the competition. His lack of accountability has resulted in numerous issues, including scheduling conflicts, poor communication with participants, and a general disorganization that has marred the reputation of the event. Furthermore, his nonchalant attitude towards the concerns raised by educators and participants alike is unacceptable. Despite repeated feedback and calls for improvement, he has shown a complete disregard for the importance of his role and the impact of his actions on the overall success of the Deans Cup Competition”.
This is about the plight of educators involved in the competition which he was irresponsible to. I met with him physically and also through calls to complain and advised him to try to be better but he chose to be irresponsible and decline the calls of educators. That’s not the attribute of a leader which he claimed to be.
Scribe: Thanks a lot. With the submission of the FLC disciplinary committee that passed him on, concerning the petitioner’s allegations. What’s your take on this?
USB: On the day of the disciplinary hearing, I believe he told you I was supposed to be there but he was my**ic in thinking that I must be invited before I can show up. He might think the committee acquitted him and it’s based on the fact that he was responsible, No. He was discharged so as not to pose more problems for him because I heard he explained himself and they bought it without anybody to bear him witness. So he should not be happy he was discharged based on fair ground.
Scribe: He believed you not being there to witness the procession, invited or not, means the petition you submitted was lacking fact, and therefore a matter of propaganda. Categorically, is the petition of originality, with facts?
USB: To clarify this and make him learn, a committee must invite you before you show up because it’s a closed door session and not a plenary. Maazi is too small to use propaganda against, I have better things to do.
If the petition lacks originality, I believe educators will not sign it and they did because it is original. I can remember vividly when I stopped posting the link and others took it upon themselves to post again and part of them are his friends and classmates. His classmates also claimed he’s incompetent and I should continue posting the link. That’s because he has betrayed the trust of a lot of educators.
I saw in his interview that I want to soil his good name and reputation. If I may ask, what good name or reputation has he built within or outside the faculty. I’m calling you to order with my petition and you took it as a case against you, that means he’s not worthy to lead anymore cos he doesn’t like to be criticized which is not possible in politics, you just have to respond to it in the right manner.
Scribe: Betrayed the trust of Educators? Don’t you think saying this will dent his image concerning his presidential candidacy and also the fact that this interview will go viral?
USB: Like I said before, I will never allow anybody to dent the name of NUESA anywhere. I’m only talking as a concerned educator and I never meant to soil an image that has been dented already when it concerns Mazi.
Scribe: Alright. You seem to be expressing yourself in a very strict tone. It shows the level of the boils you have against ‘Mazi’. Do you dislike him that much or you just don’t appreciate the fact that he’s running for Nuesa 001 with all the controversies surrounding him?
USB: I need to correct you on this once again, I have nothing against him and never will because we are not on the same level and I’m leaving soon for good. I didn’t know him until the last election at the faculty and I convinced people to vote because they wanted to void it. So why will I have anything against him? We only had issues because of the deans cup. I don’t play politics of hatred and will never do that. I believe you get me right.
Scribe: Alright Sir. That’s well registered. He made another claim that you ignored the Faculty Officer’s invitation. Is that true?
USB: Don’t mind him, I was on my way to Lagos when he called that the FO wanted to see me and I told him I will be available during the coming week when I return back to school. I came to school on that said Monday, went for my morning class and I checked his office but he wasn’t there. Perhaps he’s yet to arrive in his office for the day. I called the Nuesa President to explain to him and he explained that the Faculty Officer wanted to settle the petition issue and there’s no need to meet with him as the case has been settled with the FLC.
Scribe: Okay. Lastly, to round this up. I want you to clear the aspect of PROPAGANDA. In one of our (Assesa Press) publications, we made an opinion writeup trying to conclude that that petition was centered around the election considering the fact that his opponent is from your department.
He also made such claims that the center image of the petition is election PROPAGANDA. What’s your take on this?
USB: It’s normal for anybody to call it propaganda because when you wanna go for a political position and something comes against you in any publication, we call it propaganda to hide from the truth and he has a right to call it propaganda because I have a candidate but I’m here to tell you today that it’s based on fact rather propaganda.
Scribe: Alright. Anything you want to express before we wrap this beautiful insight up?
USB: I believe educators know what is right for us during this election and if we want the faculty to continue standing at the top, Mazi is not the right person to lead us anywhere. I believe educators know what’s good and they will not disappoint themselves.
Scribe: Okay. Thanks a lot for your time. Really appreciate it. From us here, we wish everyone best of luck. May the best candidate win for the progress of NUESA-UI
USB: Amen. May the best candidate win

























